Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBFX vs WMBLX
RLBFX vs WMBLX Comparison
Open Charts RLBFX vs WMBLX
RLBFX vs WMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBFX vs. WMBLX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBFX is a Hold and WMBLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. WMBLX (103M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than WMBLX: RLBFX (2.03) vs WMBLX (1.54). RLBFX was incepted earlier than WMBLX: RLBFX (24 years) vs WMBLX (28 years). WMBLX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WMBLX (22.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMBLX: RLBFX (250) vs WMBLX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.60 vs. WMBLX (8.70). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.04 vs. WMBLX (5.66).
| RLBFX | WMBLX | RLBFX / WMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.29 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.29 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.831 | 9.621 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 103M | 274,757% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.54 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.60 | 8.70 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.29 | 17.05 | 254% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.04 | 5.66 | 584% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.61 | 38.87 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement