Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs TSUMX
RLBGX vs TSUMX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs TSUMX
RLBGX vs TSUMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. TSUMX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Hold and TSUMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. TSUMX (113M). TSUMX pays higher dividends than RLBGX: TSUMX (2.64) vs RLBGX (2.07). RLBGX was incepted earlier than TSUMX: RLBGX (17 years) vs TSUMX (7 years). TSUMX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. TSUMX (32.68). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSUMX: RLBGX (250) vs TSUMX (2500000). TSUMX (17.87) and RLBGX (17.12) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 38.06 vs. TSUMX (22.50).
| RLBGX | TSUMX | RLBGX / TSUMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.70 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.21 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.549 | 7.935 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 113M | 254,867% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 2.64 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.12 | 17.87 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.81 | 44.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.06 | 22.50 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement