Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLBGX vs WDIIX
RLBGX vs WDIIX Comparison
Open Charts RLBGX vs WDIIX
RLBGX vs WDIIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLBGX vs. WDIIX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLBGX is a Buy and WDIIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. WDIIX (99M). WDIIX pays higher dividends than RLBGX: WDIIX (2.28) vs RLBGX (2.11). RLBGX was incepted earlier than WDIIX: RLBGX (17 years) vs WDIIX (16 years). WDIIX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WDIIX (12.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WDIIX: RLBGX (250) vs WDIIX (100000). WDIIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.53 vs. RLBGX (12.54). WDIIX return over 5 years is better than : 66.96 vs. RLBGX (36.05).
| RLBGX | WDIIX | RLBGX / WDIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.50 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.86 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.052 | 19.237 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 99M | 285,859% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 2.28 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.54 | 25.53 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.11 | 60.48 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.05 | 66.96 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.72 | 114.41 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement