Ad is loading...
RLCAX vs RMEBX
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$7.84
Change+$0.12 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.08M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$53.26
Change+$0.76 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. RLCAX (159M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: RLCAX (1.45) vs RMEBX (1.18). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: RLCAX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RLCAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMEBX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. RLCAX (-11.56). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.21 vs. RLCAX (9.47).
| RLCAX | RMEBX | RLCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.205 | -2.724 | 301% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.18 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.56 | 1.74 | -664% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.48 | 5.82 | -197% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.47 | 52.21 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.16 | 53.41 | -23% |