Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMEBX
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$9.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.33M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. RLCAX (175M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: RLCAX (1.39) vs RMEBX (1.11). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: RLCAX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RLCAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMEBX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. RLCAX (1.27). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.85 vs. RLCAX (14.26).
| RLCAX | RMEBX | RLCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.134 | 10.612 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 1.11 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.27 | 7.63 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.58 | 22.19 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.26 | 53.85 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.59 | 77.43 | 5% |