Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMEBX
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$9.18
Change+$0.05 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.32M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. RLCAX (177M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: RLCAX (1.34) vs RMEBX (1.09). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: RLCAX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RLCAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMEBX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.45 vs. RLCAX (1.94). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.11 vs. RLCAX (16.83).
| RLCAX | RMEBX | RLCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.156 | 11.179 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.09 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.94 | 7.45 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.54 | 31.44 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.83 | 55.11 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.96 | 89.18 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement