Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMEBX
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$9.29
Change+$0.10 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.46M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.62
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.43B
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. RLCAX (176M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: RLCAX (1.34) vs RMEBX (1.09). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: RLCAX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RLCAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMEBX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.60 vs. RLCAX (-0.67). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 61.00 vs. RLCAX (21.75).
| RLCAX | RMEBX | RLCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.275 | 12.407 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 176M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.09 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.67 | 5.60 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.00 | 40.61 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.75 | 61.00 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.55 | 100.45 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement