Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMEBX
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$9.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets174.54M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.27
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. RLCAX (175M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: RLCAX (1.32) vs RMEBX (1.05). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: RLCAX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RLCAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMEBX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. RLCAX (-4.31). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.76 vs. RLCAX (10.24).
| RLCAX | RMEBX | RLCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.07 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.869 | 12.462 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.05 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.31 | 5.45 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.11 | 27.22 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.24 | 50.76 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.58 | 82.68 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers