Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMEBX
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMEBX
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. RLCAX (202M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: RLCAX (1.16) vs RMEBX (1.04). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: RLCAX (18 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMEBX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.53 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. RLCAX (0.34).
| RLCAX | RMEBX | RLCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.841 | 6.308 | 267% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 202M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.04 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.53 | 9.11 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.87 | 34.37 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.34 | 34.74 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.11 | 94.33 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement