Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMEBX
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMEBX
RLCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. RLCAX (223M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: RLCAX (1.07) vs RMEBX (0.99). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: RLCAX (18 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMEBX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.78 vs. RMEBX (3.55). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.68 vs. RLCAX (2.10).
| RLCAX | RMEBX | RLCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.07 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.07 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.926 | 7.309 | 327% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 223M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.99 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.78 | 3.55 | 473% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.94 | 33.39 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.10 | 33.68 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.30 | 89.90 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers