Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMFCX
RLCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMFCX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$9.33
Change+$0.03 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.27M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.15
Change+$0.25 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.85B
RLCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. RLCAX (177M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: RLCAX (1.32) vs RMFCX (1.20). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: RLCAX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RLCAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMFCX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.91 vs. RLCAX (-0.54). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.98 vs. RLCAX (16.69).
| RLCAX | RMFCX | RLCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.583 | 14.872 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 1.20 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.54 | 6.91 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.06 | 38.39 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.69 | 59.98 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.28 | 89.51 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers