Ad is loading...
RLCAX vs RMFCX
RLCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMFCX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$7.84
Change+$0.12 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.08M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$52.96
Change+$0.76 (+1.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
RLCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. RLCAX (159M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: RLCAX (1.45) vs RMFCX (1.34). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: RLCAX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RLCAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMFCX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.87 vs. RLCAX (-11.56). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 53.32 vs. RLCAX (9.47).
| RLCAX | RMFCX | RLCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.205 | -2.681 | 306% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.34 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.56 | 1.87 | -617% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.48 | 6.27 | -183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.47 | 53.32 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.16 | 54.78 | -22% |