Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMFCX
RLCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMFCX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$9.18
Change-$0.03 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.23M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.20
Change-$0.05 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
RLCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. RLCAX (177M). RLCAX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: RLCAX (1.34) vs RMFCX (1.24). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: RLCAX (17 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RLCAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMFCX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.75 vs. RLCAX (0.84). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. RLCAX (17.78).
| RLCAX | RMFCX | RLCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.91 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.512 | 12.804 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.34 | 1.24 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.84 | 6.75 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.33 | 33.93 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.78 | 58.84 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.48 | 96.04 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement