Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMFCX
RLCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMFCX
RLCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. RLCAX (223M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than RLCAX: RMFCX (1.15) vs RLCAX (1.07). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: RLCAX (18 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMFCX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.78 vs. RMFCX (3.69). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.60 vs. RLCAX (2.10).
| RLCAX | RMFCX | RLCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.91 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.91 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.926 | 7.417 | 323% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 223M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.15 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.78 | 3.69 | 455% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.94 | 33.94 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.10 | 34.60 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.30 | 91.73 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement