Ad is loading...
RLCAX vs RMFEX
RLCAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMFEX
Columbia Disciplined Value A
Price$7.84
Change+$0.12 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.08M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$53.29
Change+$0.77 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.8B
RLCAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 95.8B vs. RLCAX (159M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than RLCAX: RMFEX (1.61) vs RLCAX (1.45). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: RLCAX (17 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RLCAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMFEX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.21 vs. RLCAX (-11.56). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 55.72 vs. RLCAX (9.47).
| RLCAX | RMFEX | RLCAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.62 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 0.62 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.205 | -2.593 | 316% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 95.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.61 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.56 | 2.21 | -522% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.48 | 7.26 | -158% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.47 | 55.72 | 17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.16 | 60.75 | -20% |