Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMFEX
RLCAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMFEX
RLCAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RLCAX (222M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than RLCAX: RMFEX (1.41) vs RLCAX (1.10). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: RLCAX (18 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMFEX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.33 vs. RMFEX (12.27). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.91 vs. RLCAX (4.01).
| RLCAX | RMFEX | RLCAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.62 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.62 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.249 | 12.313 | 213% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 222M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.41 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.33 | 12.27 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.16 | 39.37 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.01 | 41.91 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.73 | 103.75 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers