Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RMFEX
RLCAX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RMFEX
RLCAX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. RLCAX (198M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than RLCAX: RMFEX (1.45) vs RLCAX (1.16). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: RLCAX (18 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RMFEX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.42 vs. RMFEX (10.46). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.97 vs. RLCAX (-4.15).
| RLCAX | RMFEX | RLCAX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.62 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.62 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.215 | 5.987 | 254% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.45 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.42 | 10.46 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.88 | 35.96 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.15 | 35.97 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.69 | 99.50 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers