Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLCAX vs RWMHX
RLCAX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts RLCAX vs RWMHX
RLCAX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLCAX vs. RWMHX commentary
Aug 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLCAX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. RLCAX (222M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than RLCAX: RWMHX (1.34) vs RLCAX (1.10). RLCAX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: RLCAX (18 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). RLCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). RLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWMHX (32.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLCAX: RWMHX (250) vs RLCAX (2000). RLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.33 vs. RWMHX (9.55). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 30.37 vs. RLCAX (4.01).
| RLCAX | RWMHX | RLCAX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.41 | 251% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.41 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.249 | 7.424 | 354% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 222M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.34 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.33 | 9.55 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.16 | 31.93 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.01 | 30.37 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.73 | 81.76 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement