Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLEFX vs TSAMX
RLEFX vs TSAMX Comparison
Open Charts RLEFX vs TSAMX
RLEFX vs TSAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. TSAMX (111M). TSAMX pays higher dividends than RLEFX: TSAMX (2.55) vs RLEFX (1.95). RLEFX was incepted earlier than TSAMX: RLEFX (11 years) vs TSAMX (4 years). TSAMX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). RLEFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. TSAMX (32.68). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TSAMX: RLEFX (250) vs TSAMX (5000). TSAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. RLEFX (12.94).
| RLEFX | TSAMX | RLEFX / TSAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.95 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.83 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.027 | 7.113 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 111M | 259,459% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.95 | 2.55 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.94 | 14.13 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 39.13 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.66 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QKACX | 55.89 | N/A | N/A |
| Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core R6 | |||
| PEQCX | 42.85 | N/A | N/A |
| Putnam Large Cap Value C | |||
| BIRIX | 26.61 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock Sust Awr Advtg Lg Cp Cr Instl | |||
| APHQX | 15.61 | -0.03 | -0.19% |
| Artisan Mid Cap Value Institutional | |||
| JAMVX | 19.31 | -0.06 | -0.31% |
| Janus Henderson VIT Mid Cap Value Instl | |||