Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLLGX vs SFCWX
RLLGX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts RLLGX vs SFCWX
RLLGX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLLGX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLLGX is a StrongBuy and SFCWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLLGX (94.3B) and SFCWX (94.3B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . SFCWX (0.86) and RLLGX (0.85) have matching dividends . RLLGX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: RLLGX (17 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). RLLGX (0.65) and SFCWX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . RLLGX (41.00) and SFCWX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. RLLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: RLLGX (250) vs SFCWX (1000000). RLLGX (14.42) and SFCWX (14.33) have marching annual gain over last year. RLLGX return over 5 years is better than : -2.08 vs. SFCWX (-2.29).
| RLLGX | SFCWX | RLLGX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.65 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.243 | 12.242 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 94.3B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.86 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.42 | 14.33 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.71 | 31.61 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.08 | -2.29 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement