Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RLLGX vs SMCWX
RLLGX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts RLLGX vs SMCWX
RLLGX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RLLGX vs. SMCWX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RLLGX is a Buy and SMCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLLGX (91.4B) and SMCWX (91.4B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RLLGX pays higher dividends than SMCWX: RLLGX (0.88) vs SMCWX (0.60). RLLGX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: RLLGX (17 years) vs SMCWX (36 years). SMCWX (1.03) is less costly to investors than RLLGX (0.65). RLLGX (41.00) and SMCWX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. RLLGX (250) and SMCWX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLLGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.55 vs. SMCWX (8.99). RLLGX return over 5 years is better than : -7.42 vs. SMCWX (-9.27).
| RLLGX | SMCWX | RLLGX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.03 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.03 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.570 | 12.294 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.4B | 91.4B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.60 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.55 | 8.99 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.24 | 37.46 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.42 | -9.27 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.54 | 83.28 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement