RM
Price
$32.03
Change
-$0.06 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
236.25M
3 days until earnings call
RMIAF
Price
$0.76
Change
+$0.21 (+38.18%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
10.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RM vs RMIAF

Header iconRM vs RMIAF Comparison
Open Charts RM vs RMIAFBanner chart's image
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$32.03
Change-$0.06 (-0.19%)
Volume$15.24K
Capitalization236.25M
Automotive Fin
Price$0.76
Change+$0.21 (+38.18%)
Volume$12K
Capitalization10.32M
RM vs RMIAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RM vs. RMIAF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RM is a Buy and RMIAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RM: $32.03 vs. RMIAF: $0.76)
Brand notoriety: RM and RMIAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RM: 33% vs. RMIAF: 155%
Market capitalization -- RM: $236.25M vs. RMIAF: $10.32M
RM [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $236.25M. RMIAF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $10.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRMIAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RMIAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RMIAF is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMIAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RMIAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RMIAF is a better buy in the short-term than RM.

Price Growth

RM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -0.87% price change this week, while RMIAF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

RM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.57% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RM($236M) has a higher market cap than RMIAF($10.3M). RMIAF YTD gains are higher at: 38.081 vs. RM (-3.929). RMIAF has more cash in the bank: 22M vs. RM (7.41M). RMIAF has less debt than RM: RMIAF (27.6M) vs RM (1.43B). RM has higher revenues than RMIAF: RM (484M) vs RMIAF (929K).
RMRMIAFRM / RMIAF
Capitalization236M10.3M2,291%
EBITDAN/A27.7K-
Gain YTD-3.92938.081-10%
P/E Ratio14.49N/A-
Revenue484M929K52,099%
Total Cash7.41M22M34%
Total Debt1.43B27.6M5,188%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RM vs RMIAF: Fundamental Ratings
RM
RMIAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8247
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65100
SMR RATING
1..100
1376
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8618
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RMIAF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as RM (24) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RMIAF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMIAF (100) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (13) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMIAF (76) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMIAF’s over the last 12 months.

RMIAF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as RM (55) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RMIAF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

RMIAF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RM (86) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that RMIAF’s stock grew significantly faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMRMIAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KASHF0.02N/A
+15.05%
INTELLABRIDGE TECHNOLOGY CORP.
CCNB11.590.02
+0.17%
Coastal Carolina Bancshares Inc
FJTNF27.73N/A
N/A
Fuji Media Holdings, Inc.
MRCBF83.27N/A
N/A
Morguard Corp.
SRTOY21.84N/A
N/A
Sartorius Stedim Biotech

RMIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMIAF and RM have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMIAF and RM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMIAF
1D Price
Change %
RMIAF100%
N/A
RM - RMIAF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
WSC - RMIAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
MCVT - RMIAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+218.92%
PRPS - RMIAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIXGF - RMIAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More