RM
Price
$34.27
Change
-$1.06 (-3.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
236.25M
66 days until earnings call
SYF
Price
$61.41
Change
-$2.44 (-3.82%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
17.54B
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

RM vs SYF

Header iconRM vs SYF Comparison
Open Charts RM vs SYFBanner chart's image
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT
Price$34.27
Change-$1.06 (-3.00%)
Volume$33.77K
Capitalization236.25M
Synchrony Financial
Price$61.41
Change-$2.44 (-3.82%)
Volume$3.94M
Capitalization17.54B
RM vs SYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RM vs. SYF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RM is a Hold and SYF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (RM: $34.27 vs. SYF: $61.41)
Brand notoriety: RM: Not notable vs. SYF: Notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RM: 69% vs. SYF: 109%
Market capitalization -- RM: $236.25M vs. SYF: $17.54B
RM [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $236.25M. SYF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $17.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SYF is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SYF is a better buy in the short-term than RM.

Price Growth

RM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -4.57% price change this week, while SYF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -5.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

RM is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

SYF is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-1.42% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SYF($17.5B) has a higher market cap than RM($236M). RM has higher P/E ratio than SYF: RM (14.49) vs SYF (8.04). RM YTD gains are higher at: 1.693 vs. SYF (-5.179). RM has less debt than SYF: RM (1.43B) vs SYF (16B). SYF has higher revenues than RM: SYF (13.6B) vs RM (484M).
RMSYFRM / SYF
Capitalization236M17.5B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.693-5.179-33%
P/E Ratio14.498.04180%
Revenue484M13.6B4%
Total Cash7.41MN/A-
Total Debt1.43B16B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RM vs SYF: Fundamental Ratings
RM
SYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7767
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6922
SMR RATING
1..100
133
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9158
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RM's Valuation (19) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for SYF (86). This means that RM’s stock grew significantly faster than SYF’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (69). This means that SYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's SMR Rating (3) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as RM (13). This means that SYF’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as SYF (48). This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to SYF’s over the last 12 months.

SYF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (91). This means that SYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RMSYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HFQDX6.46-0.01
-0.15%
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income D
MAILX20.89-0.09
-0.43%
BlackRock International Instl
MPLAX13.60-0.08
-0.58%
Praxis International Index A
NIOAX13.23-0.13
-0.97%
Neuberger Berman Intl Small Cap A
SJCAX31.07-0.61
-1.93%
Steward Large Cap Core A

SYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SYF has been closely correlated with COF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SYF jumps, then COF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SYF
1D Price
Change %
SYF100%
-3.82%
COF - SYF
83%
Closely correlated
-2.52%
DFS - SYF
78%
Closely correlated
-2.78%
BFH - SYF
76%
Closely correlated
-4.59%
SLM - SYF
68%
Closely correlated
-4.21%
AXP - SYF
68%
Closely correlated
-2.78%
More