Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs RMFAX
RMEBX vs RMFAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs RMFAX
RMEBX vs RMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. RMFAX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and RMFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX (118B) and RMFAX (118B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RMEBX pays higher dividends than RMFAX: RMEBX (1.00) vs RMFAX (0.75). RMEBX was incepted earlier than RMFAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs RMFAX (24 years). RMFAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX (30.00) and RMFAX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMEBX (250) and RMFAX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.88 vs. RMFAX (6.51). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. RMFAX (33.12).
| RMEBX | RMFAX | RMEBX / RMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.36 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.36 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.533 | 8.362 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 118B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.75 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 6.51 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.86 | 29.59 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.24 | 33.12 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.54 | 84.59 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement