Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs RRFDX
RMEBX vs RRFDX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs RRFDX
RMEBX vs RRFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. RRFDX commentary
Jun 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and RRFDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. RRFDX (17.8B). RMEBX (1.04) and RRFDX (1.02) have matching dividends . RMEBX was incepted earlier than RRFDX: RMEBX (12 years) vs RRFDX (24 years). RRFDX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RRFDX (18.20). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRFDX: RMEBX (250) vs RRFDX (2500). RRFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.13 vs. RMEBX (9.99). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.92 vs. RRFDX (28.13).
| RMEBX | RRFDX | RMEBX / RRFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.25 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.25 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.242 | 13.934 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 17.8B | 657% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.02 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.99 | 23.13 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.35 | 37.54 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.92 | 28.13 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.00 | 64.95 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement