Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs RRFDX
RMEBX vs RRFDX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs RRFDX
RMEBX vs RRFDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. RRFDX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and RRFDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RRFDX (18.2B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than RRFDX: RMEBX (0.99) vs RRFDX (0.87). RMEBX was incepted earlier than RRFDX: RMEBX (12 years) vs RRFDX (24 years). RRFDX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RRFDX (18.20). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRFDX: RMEBX (250) vs RRFDX (2500). RRFDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.49 vs. RMEBX (9.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. RRFDX (32.04).
| RMEBX | RRFDX | RMEBX / RRFDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.25 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.25 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.367 | 18.406 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 18.2B | 648% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.87 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.03 | 23.49 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.30 | 44.29 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | 32.04 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.55 | 63.37 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers