Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs RSDFX
RMEBX vs RSDFX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs RSDFX
RMEBX vs RSDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. RSDFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and RSDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. RSDFX (2.44B). RSDFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: RSDFX (2.52) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than RSDFX: RMEBX (12 years) vs RSDFX (18 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RSDFX (0.74). RSDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RSDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: RSDFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RSDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.01 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. RSDFX (29.68).
| RMEBX | RSDFX | RMEBX / RSDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.74 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.74 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.801 | 11.913 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 2.44B | 4,713% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 2.52 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 20.01 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.14 | 45.47 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.93 | 29.68 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.84 | 53.04 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement