Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs RSDFX
RMEBX vs RSDFX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs RSDFX
RMEBX vs RSDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. RSDFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and RSDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RSDFX (2.56B). RSDFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: RSDFX (2.36) vs RMEBX (0.99). RMEBX was incepted earlier than RSDFX: RMEBX (12 years) vs RSDFX (18 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RSDFX (0.74). RSDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RSDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: RSDFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RSDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.95 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX (36.13) and RSDFX (35.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMEBX | RSDFX | RMEBX / RSDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.74 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.74 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.416 | 16.517 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.56B | 4,609% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 2.36 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.96 | 20.95 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.63 | 42.53 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.13 | 35.96 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.64 | 54.65 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers