Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs RSDFX
RMEBX vs RSDFX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs RSDFX
RMEBX vs RSDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. RSDFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and RSDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RSDFX (2.53B). RSDFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: RSDFX (2.40) vs RMEBX (1.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than RSDFX: RMEBX (12 years) vs RSDFX (18 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RSDFX (0.74). RSDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RSDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: RSDFX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RSDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. RMEBX (8.73). RMEBX (36.28) and RSDFX (34.98) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMEBX | RSDFX | RMEBX / RSDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.74 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.74 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.059 | 15.642 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.53B | 4,666% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 2.40 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 18.07 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.30 | 45.33 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.28 | 34.98 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.36 | 50.65 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers