Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs RSEDX
RMEBX vs RSEDX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs RSEDX
RMEBX vs RSEDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. RSEDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and RSEDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. RSEDX (3.75B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than RSEDX: RMEBX (0.99) vs RSEDX (0.83). RMEBX was incepted earlier than RSEDX: RMEBX (12 years) vs RSEDX (20 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RSEDX (0.70). RSEDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RSEDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: RSEDX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RSEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.41 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RSEDX (36.41) and RMEBX (34.68) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMEBX | RSEDX | RMEBX / RSEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.70 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.70 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.448 | 19.915 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 3.75B | 3,117% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.83 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 18.41 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.88 | 47.00 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.68 | 36.41 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.45 | 91.45 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers