Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs RSEDX
RMEBX vs RSEDX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs RSEDX
RMEBX vs RSEDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. RSEDX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and RSEDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. RSEDX (3.52B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than RSEDX: RMEBX (1.04) vs RSEDX (0.92). RMEBX was incepted earlier than RSEDX: RMEBX (12 years) vs RSEDX (20 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RSEDX (0.70). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RSEDX (27.00). RSEDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: RSEDX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RSEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.27 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. RSEDX (32.25).
| RMEBX | RSEDX | RMEBX / RSEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.70 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.70 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 14.350 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 3.52B | 3,322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.92 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 24.27 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.37 | 46.10 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.74 | 32.25 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.33 | 91.25 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement