Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs RSEDX
RMEBX vs RSEDX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs RSEDX
RMEBX vs RSEDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. RSEDX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and RSEDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. RSEDX (3.78B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than RSEDX: RMEBX (0.99) vs RSEDX (0.85). RMEBX was incepted earlier than RSEDX: RMEBX (12 years) vs RSEDX (20 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than RSEDX (0.70). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RSEDX (27.00). RSEDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: RSEDX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RSEDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.19 vs. RMEBX (9.03). RSEDX (36.50) and RMEBX (35.75) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMEBX | RSEDX | RMEBX / RSEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.70 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.70 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.367 | 20.416 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 3.78B | 3,125% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.85 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.03 | 23.19 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.30 | 49.87 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | 36.50 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.55 | 87.91 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement