Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs RYDKX
RMEBX vs RYDKX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs RYDKX
RMEBX vs RYDKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. RYDKX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and RYDKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. RYDKX (23.9M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than RYDKX: RMEBX (0.99) vs RYDKX (0.21). RMEBX was incepted earlier than RYDKX: RMEBX (12 years) vs RYDKX (11 years). RYDKX (2.41) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RYDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 145.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYDKX: RMEBX (250) vs RYDKX (2500). RYDKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.87 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RYDKX return over 5 years is better than : 37.56 vs. RMEBX (34.68).
| RMEBX | RYDKX | RMEBX / RYDKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.35 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.41 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.448 | 7.818 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 23.9M | 489,540% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.21 | 464% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 11.87 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.88 | 44.74 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.68 | 37.56 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.45 | 129.62 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers