Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs RYZAX
RMEBX vs RYZAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs RYZAX
RMEBX vs RYZAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. RYZAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and RYZAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. RYZAX (109M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than RYZAX: RMEBX (1.04) vs RYZAX (0.18). RMEBX was incepted earlier than RYZAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs RYZAX (22 years). RYZAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RYZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 2642.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYZAX: RMEBX (250) vs RYZAX (2500). RYZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.00 vs. RMEBX (10.14). RYZAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.37 vs. RMEBX (35.62).
| RMEBX | RYZAX | RMEBX / RYZAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.55 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.60 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.444 | 8.999 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 109M | 107,339% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.18 | 582% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.14 | 23.00 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.54 | 54.92 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.62 | 54.37 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.57 | 128.67 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement