Ad is loading...
RMEBX vs SFLNX
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.54
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$28.90
Change-$0.41 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.8B
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SFLNX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SFLNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. SFLNX (9.8B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SFLNX (1.70) vs RMEBX (1.54). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMEBX (10 years) vs SFLNX (18 years). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. SFLNX (7.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: SFLNX (0) vs RMEBX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.43 vs. RMEBX (10.88). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 70.44 vs. RMEBX (40.75).
| RMEBX | SFLNX | RMEBX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.809 | 3.733 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 9.8B | 1,072% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.54 | 1.70 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.88 | 16.43 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.18 | 35.62 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.75 | 70.44 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.29 | 101.52 | 62% |