Ad is loading...
RMEBX vs SFLNX
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$54.45
Change-$1.82 (-3.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$26.79
Change-$1.31 (-4.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.51B
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SFLNX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a StrongBuy and SFLNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. SFLNX (9.51B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SFLNX (1.78) vs RMEBX (1.18). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SFLNX (18 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: SFLNX (0) vs RMEBX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.77 vs. RMEBX (6.63). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 135.12 vs. RMEBX (74.87).
| RMEBX | SFLNX | RMEBX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.25 | 428% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.25 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.774 | 0.861 | 322% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 9.51B | 1,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 1.78 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.63 | 8.77 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.00 | 26.21 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.87 | 135.12 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.22 | 99.00 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...