Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SFLNX
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SFLNX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.50
Change-$0.20 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.3B
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Idx
Price$30.95
Change-$0.13 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.22B
RMEBX vs SFLNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SFLNX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SFLNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. SFLNX (10.2B). SFLNX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SFLNX (1.63) vs RMEBX (1.09). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SFLNX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SFLNX (18 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than SFLNX (0.25). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SFLNX (8.00). SFLNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: SFLNX (0) vs RMEBX (250). SFLNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.66 vs. RMEBX (7.81). SFLNX return over 5 years is better than : 96.36 vs. RMEBX (59.03).
| RMEBX | SFLNX | RMEBX / SFLNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.25 | 428% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.25 | 428% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.626 | 11.091 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 110B | 10.2B | 1,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.63 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.81 | 14.66 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.30 | 53.87 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.03 | 96.36 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.75 | 134.40 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement