Ad is loading...
RMEBX vs SLCVX
RMEBX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$52.50
Change-$1.36 (-2.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$24.09
Change-$0.73 (-2.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.19M
RMEBX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SLCVX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and SLCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. SLCVX (17.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMEBX (1.18) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.97 vs. SLCVX (-14.15). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.93 vs. SLCVX (37.43).
| RMEBX | SLCVX | RMEBX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.88 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.88 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.628 | -4.502 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 98.3B | 17.2M | 571,512% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.18 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.97 | -14.15 | -21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.69 | -8.18 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.93 | 37.43 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.39 | 5.68 | 976% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers