Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SLCVX
RMEBX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.60
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$28.97
Change+$0.24 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.69M
RMEBX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SLCVX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SLCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. SLCVX (18.7M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMEBX (1.16) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. SLCVX (0.28). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.71 vs. SLCVX (43.43).
| RMEBX | SLCVX | RMEBX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.88 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.88 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.315 | 10.543 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 107B | 18.7M | 572,193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.50 | 0.28 | 3,401% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.88 | 15.43 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.71 | 43.43 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.51 | 24.97 | 298% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement