Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SLCVX
RMEBX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.95
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$28.41
Change+$0.27 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.6M
RMEBX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SLCVX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SLCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. SLCVX (18.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMEBX (1.16) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. SLCVX (-2.53). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. SLCVX (28.67).
| RMEBX | SLCVX | RMEBX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.88 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.88 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.842 | 8.272 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 105B | 18.6M | 564,516% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.87 | -2.53 | -351% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.32 | 6.71 | 258% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.55 | 28.67 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.95 | 19.81 | 348% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement