Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SLCVX
RMEBX vs SLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SLCVX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.78
Change+$0.16 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.64B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value I
Price$29.11
Change+$0.18 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.7M
RMEBX vs SLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SLCVX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SLCVX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. SLCVX (18.7M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SLCVX: RMEBX (1.12) vs SLCVX (0.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SLCVX: RMEBX (11 years) vs SLCVX (31 years). SLCVX (1.88) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX (250) and SLCVX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.09 vs. SLCVX (-2.00). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 56.05 vs. SLCVX (35.31).
| RMEBX | SLCVX | RMEBX / SLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.88 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.88 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.476 | 11.312 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 18.7M | 582,888% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.09 | -2.00 | -405% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.20 | 18.61 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.05 | 35.31 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.47 | 23.75 | 314% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement