RMEBX
Price
$64.31
Change
-$0.21 (-0.33%)
Updated
Sep 1 closing price
Net Assets
117.86B
SSHVX
Price
$44.37
Change
-$0.26 (-0.58%)
Updated
Aug 31 closing price
Net Assets
999.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RMEBX vs SSHVX

RMEBX vs SSHVX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 59.43B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 999.61M to 117.86B. RMEBX holds the highest valuation in this group at 117.86B. The lowest valued company is SSHVX at 999.61M.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -1%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 7%. RMEBX experienced the highest price growth at -1%, while SSHVX experienced the biggest fall at -1%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
VS
RMEBX vs. SSHVX commentary
Sep 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SSHVX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SSHVX (1B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SSHVX: RMEBX (0.99) vs SSHVX (0.78). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SSHVX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SSHVX (13 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than SSHVX (0.86). SSHVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSHVX: RMEBX (250) vs SSHVX (1000000). SSHVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.51 vs. RMEBX (6.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.91 vs. SSHVX (-8.75).
RMEBXSSHVXRMEBX / SSHVX
Total Expense Ratio1.070.75143%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio1.070.86124%
Fund Existence12 years13 years-
Gain YTD9.1959.209100%
Front LoadN/AN/A-
Min. Initial Investment25010000000%
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets118B1B11,800%
Annual Yield % from dividends0.990.78127%
Returns for 1 year6.988.5182%
Returns for 3 years34.7119.91174%
Returns for 5 years32.91-8.75-376%
Returns for 10 years89.039.00989%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSICX51.59N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index C
NMSAX24.16N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Index A
UAPIX102.61N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Inv
MLVHX19.34N/A
N/A
MFS Low Volatility Equity I
HLIZX32.14N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner International Eq Instl Z