Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs STREX
RMEBX vs STREX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs STREX
RMEBX vs STREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. STREX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and STREX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. STREX (562M). STREX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: STREX (1.04) vs RMEBX (0.99). RMEBX was incepted earlier than STREX: RMEBX (12 years) vs STREX (9 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than STREX (0.82). STREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.76 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than STREX: RMEBX (250) vs STREX (10000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. STREX (-16.27). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. STREX (-26.22).
| RMEBX | STREX | RMEBX / STREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.70 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.82 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.448 | 7.657 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 562M | 20,819% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.04 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | -16.27 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.88 | -25.64 | -136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.68 | -26.22 | -132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers