Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs STREX
RMEBX vs STREX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs STREX
RMEBX vs STREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. STREX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and STREX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. STREX (581M). STREX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: STREX (1.25) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than STREX: RMEBX (12 years) vs STREX (8 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than STREX (0.82). STREX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.76 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than STREX: RMEBX (250) vs STREX (10000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. STREX (-15.35). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. STREX (-25.72).
| RMEBX | STREX | RMEBX / STREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.70 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.82 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 4.492 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 581M | 20,138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.25 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | -15.35 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.37 | -25.10 | -137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.74 | -25.72 | -135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement