Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs STVZX
RMEBX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.19
Change-$0.13 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.7B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$9.87
Change-$0.05 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets522.87M
RMEBX vs STVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. STVZX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and STVZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. STVZX (523M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: STVZX (1.57) vs RMEBX (1.21). RMEBX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMEBX (11 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than STVZX (0.88). STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMEBX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.96 vs. STVZX (-14.32). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.69 vs. STVZX (-4.04).
| RMEBX | STVZX | RMEBX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.72 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.88 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.628 | -2.277 | -115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 103B | 523M | 19,694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.21 | 1.57 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.96 | -14.32 | -42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.21 | -7.22 | -239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.69 | -4.04 | -1,429% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.64 | -33.08 | -186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement