Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs STVZX
RMEBX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$10.15
Change-$0.14 (-1.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets573.24M
RMEBX vs STVZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. STVZX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and STVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. STVZX (573M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: STVZX (1.51) vs RMEBX (1.16). RMEBX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMEBX (11 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than STVZX (0.88). STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMEBX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. STVZX (-11.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. STVZX (-5.35).
| RMEBX | STVZX | RMEBX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.72 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.88 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.923 | 0.495 | 1,197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106B | 573M | 18,499% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.51 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.54 | -11.96 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.89 | 2.00 | 1,397% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.69 | -5.35 | -1,097% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.22 | -31.67 | -215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement