Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs STVZX
RMEBX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs STVZX
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.87
Change+$0.15 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.87B
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity R6
Price$10.52
Change-$0.03 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets619.59M
RMEBX vs STVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. STVZX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and STVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. STVZX (620M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: STVZX (1.47) vs RMEBX (1.12). RMEBX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMEBX (11 years) vs STVZX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than STVZX (0.88). STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMEBX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.49 vs. STVZX (-8.80). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 57.31 vs. STVZX (-1.46).
| RMEBX | STVZX | RMEBX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.72 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.88 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.641 | 4.455 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 620M | 17,581% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.47 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.49 | -8.80 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.38 | 8.09 | 375% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.31 | -1.46 | -3,934% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.78 | -27.79 | -269% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement