Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs STVZX
RMEBX vs STVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs STVZX
RMEBX vs STVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. STVZX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and STVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. STVZX (275M). STVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: STVZX (1.89) vs RMEBX (0.99). RMEBX was incepted earlier than STVZX: RMEBX (12 years) vs STVZX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than STVZX (0.89). STVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 157.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than STVZX: RMEBX (250) vs STVZX (2500000). STVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. STVZX (-22.02).
| RMEBX | STVZX | RMEBX / STVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.72 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.89 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.416 | 14.928 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 275M | 42,909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.89 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.96 | 9.83 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.63 | 9.59 | 340% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.13 | -22.02 | -164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.64 | -17.01 | -533% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers