Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SUVAX
RMEBX vs SUVAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVAX
RMEBX vs SUVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and SUVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. SUVAX (262M). SUVAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SUVAX (1.17) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SUVAX (25 years). SUVAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SUVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVAX: RMEBX (250) vs SUVAX (1000). SUVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.61 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. SUVAX (2.96).
| RMEBX | SUVAX | RMEBX / SUVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.11 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.33 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 16.126 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 262M | 44,656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.17 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 14.61 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.37 | 23.54 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.74 | 2.96 | 1,175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.33 | 32.41 | 291% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement