Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SUVCX
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVCX
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and SUVCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. SUVCX (262M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SUVCX: RMEBX (1.04) vs SUVCX (0.56). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SUVCX (25 years). SUVCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMEBX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). SUVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.61 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. SUVCX (-7.75).
| RMEBX | SUVCX | RMEBX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.13 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.52 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 15.502 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 262M | 44,656% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.56 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 10.61 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.37 | 14.19 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.74 | -7.75 | -448% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.33 | 11.29 | 836% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement