Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SUVCX
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVCX
RMEBX vs SUVCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and SUVCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SUVCX (264M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than SUVCX: RMEBX (1.00) vs SUVCX (0.55). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVCX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SUVCX (25 years). SUVCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SUVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SUVCX: RMEBX (250) vs SUVCX (1000). SUVCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.04 vs. RMEBX (8.73). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.28 vs. SUVCX (-5.41).
| RMEBX | SUVCX | RMEBX / SUVCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.13 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 2.52 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.059 | 18.338 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 264M | 44,697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.55 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 10.04 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.30 | 12.93 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.28 | -5.41 | -671% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.36 | 7.49 | 1,194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers