Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SUVZX
RMEBX vs SUVZX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SUVZX
RMEBX vs SUVZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SUVZX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and SUVZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. SUVZX (257M). SUVZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SUVZX (1.36) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SUVZX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SUVZX (25 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than SUVZX (0.95). SUVZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). SUVZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: SUVZX (0) vs RMEBX (250). SUVZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.59 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. SUVZX (-0.03).
| RMEBX | SUVZX | RMEBX / SUVZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.79 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.95 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.801 | 14.332 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 257M | 44,747% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.36 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 14.59 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.14 | 25.25 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.93 | -0.03 | -98,977% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.84 | 32.45 | 277% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement