Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SVAAX
RMEBX vs SVAAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SVAAX
RMEBX vs SVAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SVAAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and SVAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. SVAAX (9.38B). SVAAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SVAAX (3.05) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SVAAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SVAAX (21 years). SVAAX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). SVAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SVAAX: RMEBX (250) vs SVAAX (1500). SVAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. RMEBX (9.98). SVAAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.28 vs. RMEBX (32.93).
| RMEBX | SVAAX | RMEBX / SVAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.06 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.16 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.801 | 8.242 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 9.38B | 1,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 3.05 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 15.06 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.14 | 42.94 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.93 | 43.28 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.84 | 47.81 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement