Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SVFCX
RMEBX vs SVFCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SVFCX
RMEBX vs SVFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SVFCX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and SVFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SVFCX (4.1B). RMEBX (1.00) and SVFCX (0.97) have matching dividends . RMEBX was incepted earlier than SVFCX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SVFCX (6 years). SVFCX (1.82) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. SVFCX (16.25). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SVFCX: RMEBX (250) vs SVFCX (25000). SVFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.30 vs. RMEBX (6.88). SVFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.59 vs. RMEBX (35.24).
| RMEBX | SVFCX | RMEBX / SVFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.82 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.82 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.533 | 20.073 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 25000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 4.1B | 2,880% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.97 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 26.30 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.86 | 40.26 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.24 | 52.59 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement