Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SVFKX
RMEBX vs SVFKX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SVFKX
RMEBX vs SVFKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SVFKX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and SVFKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. SVFKX (4.1B). SVFKX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SVFKX (1.24) vs RMEBX (1.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SVFKX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SVFKX (12 years). SVFKX (1.76) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. SVFKX (16.25). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SVFKX: RMEBX (250) vs SVFKX (25000). SVFKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.71 vs. RMEBX (6.88). SVFKX return over 5 years is better than : 55.76 vs. RMEBX (35.24).
| RMEBX | SVFKX | RMEBX / SVFKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.45 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.76 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.533 | 20.336 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 25000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 4.1B | 2,880% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.24 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 26.71 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.86 | 41.70 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.24 | 55.76 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.54 | 173.65 | 51% |