Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SWDSX
RMEBX vs SWDSX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SWDSX
RMEBX vs SWDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SWDSX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and SWDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. SWDSX (662M). SWDSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SWDSX (1.50) vs RMEBX (0.99). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SWDSX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SWDSX (23 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than SWDSX (0.89). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. SWDSX (8.00). SWDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: SWDSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). SWDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. RMEBX (3.28). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.43 vs. SWDSX (28.50).
| RMEBX | SWDSX | RMEBX / SWDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.89 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.89 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.309 | 10.046 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 662M | 17,674% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.50 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | 11.27 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.11 | 55.47 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.43 | 28.50 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.89 | 48.08 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement