Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs SWDSX
RMEBX vs SWDSX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs SWDSX
RMEBX vs SWDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. SWDSX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and SWDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. SWDSX (633M). SWDSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: SWDSX (1.59) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than SWDSX: RMEBX (12 years) vs SWDSX (23 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than SWDSX (0.89). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. SWDSX (8.00). SWDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: SWDSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). SWDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.08 vs. RMEBX (10.26). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. SWDSX (29.88).
| RMEBX | SWDSX | RMEBX / SWDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.89 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.89 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.614 | 6.709 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 633M | 18,483% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.59 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.26 | 15.08 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.20 | 42.42 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.34 | 29.88 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.84 | 47.69 | 193% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers