Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TDFAX
RMEBX vs TDFAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TDFAX
RMEBX vs TDFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TDFAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and TDFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. TDFAX (216M). RMEBX (1.04) and TDFAX (1.00) have matching dividends . RMEBX was incepted earlier than TDFAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TDFAX (13 years). RMEBX (1.07) and TDFAX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TDFAX (22.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TDFAX: RMEBX (250) vs TDFAX (1000). TDFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.38 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. TDFAX (15.36).
| RMEBX | TDFAX | RMEBX / TDFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.07 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.801 | 14.791 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 216M | 53,241% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.00 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 23.38 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.14 | 49.21 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.93 | 15.36 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.84 | -2.86 | -3,139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement