Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TGDVX
RMEBX vs TGDVX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TGDVX
RMEBX vs TGDVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TGDVX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and TGDVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TGDVX (556M). TGDVX (1.05) and RMEBX (1.04) have matching dividends . RMEBX was incepted earlier than TGDVX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TGDVX (28 years). RMEBX (1.07) and TGDVX (1.02) have similar cost to investors . TGDVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.97 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGDVX: RMEBX (250) vs TGDVX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. TGDVX (4.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. TGDVX (20.33).
| RMEBX | TGDVX | RMEBX / TGDVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.85 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.02 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 11.359 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 556M | 21,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.05 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 4.96 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.37 | 30.28 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.74 | 20.33 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.33 | -9.68 | -974% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement