Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TILCX
RMEBX vs TILCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TILCX
RMEBX vs TILCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TILCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and TILCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. TILCX (2.87B). TILCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: TILCX (1.57) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TILCX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TILCX (26 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TILCX (0.56). TILCX (31.20) and RMEBX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TILCX: RMEBX (250) vs TILCX (500000). TILCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.03 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. TILCX (0.85).
| RMEBX | TILCX | RMEBX / TILCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.56 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.56 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.801 | 14.367 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 2.87B | 4,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.57 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 14.03 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.14 | 27.24 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.93 | 0.85 | 3,865% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.84 | 54.57 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement