Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TQCAX
RMEBX vs TQCAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TQCAX
RMEBX vs TQCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TQCAX commentary
Jul 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and TQCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TQCAX (2.48B). TQCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: TQCAX (1.27) vs RMEBX (1.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TQCAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TQCAX (28 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TQCAX (1.01). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCAX (12.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCAX: RMEBX (250) vs TQCAX (2500). TQCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.33 vs. RMEBX (8.65). RMEBX (36.34) and TQCAX (35.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMEBX | TQCAX | RMEBX / TQCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.99 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.01 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.110 | 12.123 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 2.48B | 4,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.65 | 13.33 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.95 | 40.38 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.34 | 35.97 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.61 | 61.79 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement