Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TQCAX
RMEBX vs TQCAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TQCAX
RMEBX vs TQCAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TQCAX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and TQCAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TQCAX (2.46B). TQCAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: TQCAX (1.27) vs RMEBX (1.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TQCAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TQCAX (28 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TQCAX (1.01). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCAX (12.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCAX: RMEBX (250) vs TQCAX (2500). TQCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.22 vs. RMEBX (7.56). TQCAX (36.19) and RMEBX (36.13) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMEBX | TQCAX | RMEBX / TQCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.99 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.01 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.246 | 12.072 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.46B | 4,795% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 13.22 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.88 | 34.43 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.13 | 36.19 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.32 | 57.98 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers