Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TQCCX
RMEBX vs TQCCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TQCCX
RMEBX vs TQCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TQCCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and TQCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TQCCX (2.47B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than TQCCX: RMEBX (0.99) vs TQCCX (0.60). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TQCCX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TQCCX (28 years). TQCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCCX (12.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCCX: RMEBX (250) vs TQCCX (2500). TQCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. TQCCX (32.48).
| RMEBX | TQCCX | RMEBX / TQCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.69 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.78 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.416 | 12.471 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.47B | 4,770% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.60 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.96 | 15.05 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.63 | 32.15 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.13 | 32.48 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.64 | 53.77 | 169% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers