Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TQCCX
RMEBX vs TQCCX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TQCCX
RMEBX vs TQCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TQCCX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and TQCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TQCCX (2.47B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than TQCCX: RMEBX (1.04) vs TQCCX (0.69). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TQCCX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TQCCX (28 years). TQCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCCX (12.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCCX: RMEBX (250) vs TQCCX (2500). TQCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.34 vs. RMEBX (9.16). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.79 vs. TQCCX (28.13).
| RMEBX | TQCCX | RMEBX / TQCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.69 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.78 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.885 | 10.747 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 2.47B | 4,741% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.69 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.16 | 16.34 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.97 | 35.26 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.79 | 28.13 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.81 | 56.82 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement