Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TQCIX
RMEBX vs TQCIX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TQCIX
RMEBX vs TQCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TQCIX (2.47B). TQCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: TQCIX (1.52) vs RMEBX (0.99). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TQCIX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TQCIX (5 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TQCIX (0.88). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCIX (12.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCIX: RMEBX (250) vs TQCIX (500000). TQCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.54 vs. RMEBX (4.65). TQCIX return over 5 years is better than : 40.52 vs. RMEBX (34.68).
| RMEBX | TQCIX | RMEBX / TQCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.65 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.88 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.448 | 14.617 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 2.47B | 4,729% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.52 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 12.54 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.88 | 43.47 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.68 | 40.52 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.45 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement