Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TQCIX
RMEBX vs TQCIX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TQCIX
RMEBX vs TQCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TQCIX (2.44B). TQCIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: TQCIX (1.63) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TQCIX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TQCIX (5 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TQCIX (0.88). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCIX (12.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCIX: RMEBX (250) vs TQCIX (500000). TQCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.35 vs. RMEBX (9.70).
| RMEBX | TQCIX | RMEBX / TQCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.65 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.88 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.105 | 10.032 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 2.44B | 4,799% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.63 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.70 | 17.35 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.94 | 36.83 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.68 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.94 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MXEVX | 13.43 | -0.02 | -0.15% |
| Empower Core Strategies Intl Eq Inv | |||
| LGCAX | 21.51 | -0.15 | -0.69% |
| Lord Abbett Global Equity A | |||
| CGIOX | 55.32 | -0.44 | -0.79% |
| Calamos Growth and Income R6 | |||
| JRAAX | 93.29 | -1.09 | -1.15% |
| Janus Henderson Research A | |||
| DPRCX | 14.69 | -0.19 | -1.28% |
| Nomura Global Listed Real Assets C | |||