RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TQCRX (2.52B). TQCRX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: TQCRX (1.55) vs RMEBX (0.99). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TQCRX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TQCRX (5 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TQCRX (0.78). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCRX (12.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCRX: RMEBX (250) vs TQCRX (50000). TQCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.77 vs. RMEBX (9.03). TQCRX return over 5 years is better than : 40.68 vs. RMEBX (35.75).

	RMEBX	TQCRX	RMEBX / TQCRX
Total Expense Ratio	1.07	0.64	167%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	1.07	0.78	137%
Fund Existence	12 years	5 years	-
Gain YTD	10.367	15.742	66%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	250	50000	1%
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	118B	2.52B	4,692%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.99	1.55	64%
Returns for 1 year	9.03	16.77	54%
Returns for 3 years	38.30	46.59	82%
Returns for 5 years	35.75	40.68	88%
Returns for 10 years	90.55	N/A	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

ETFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
JGLO	73.49	0.42	+0.57%
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF
XBFR	26.77	0.11	+0.41%
Innovator Equity Managed 10 Buffer ETF
PMMY	27.03	N/A	N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May
XTRE	48.78	-0.05	-0.10%
BondBloxx Bloomberg ThreeYrTrgDurUSTrETF
NDMO	9.94	-0.02	-0.20%
Nuveen Dynamic Municipal Opportunities Fund