Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TQCYX
RMEBX vs TQCYX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TQCYX
RMEBX vs TQCYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TQCYX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and TQCYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. TQCYX (2.45B). TQCYX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: TQCYX (1.53) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TQCYX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TQCYX (13 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TQCYX (0.76). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCYX (12.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCYX: RMEBX (250) vs TQCYX (2500). TQCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.81 vs. RMEBX (9.98). TQCYX (33.25) and RMEBX (32.93) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMEBX | TQCYX | RMEBX / TQCYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.76 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.76 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.801 | 10.202 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 2.45B | 4,690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.53 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 19.81 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.14 | 41.05 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.93 | 33.25 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.84 | 67.89 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement