Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TQCYX
RMEBX vs TQCYX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TQCYX
RMEBX vs TQCYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TQCYX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and TQCYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. TQCYX (2.48B). TQCYX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: TQCYX (1.49) vs RMEBX (1.00). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TQCYX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TQCYX (13 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TQCYX (0.76). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. TQCYX (12.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TQCYX: RMEBX (250) vs TQCYX (2500). TQCYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. RMEBX (8.73). TQCYX (37.96) and RMEBX (36.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RMEBX | TQCYX | RMEBX / TQCYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.76 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.76 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.059 | 12.600 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 2.48B | 4,760% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.49 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 14.13 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.30 | 38.59 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.28 | 37.96 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.36 | 62.57 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers