Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TRCVX
RMEBX vs TRCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TRCVX
RMEBX vs TRCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TRCVX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and TRCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. TRCVX (12.9B). TRCVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: TRCVX (1.40) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TRCVX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TRCVX (24 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TRCVX (0.30). TRCVX (31.00) and RMEBX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. TRCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: TRCVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). TRCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.90 vs. RMEBX (9.98). TRCVX return over 5 years is better than : 41.33 vs. RMEBX (32.93).
| RMEBX | TRCVX | RMEBX / TRCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.30 | 357% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.30 | 357% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.801 | 13.264 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 12.9B | 891% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.40 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 22.90 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.14 | 52.40 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.93 | 41.33 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.84 | 116.01 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement