Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TRZAX
RMEBX vs TRZAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TRZAX
RMEBX vs TRZAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TRZAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and TRZAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. TRZAX (33.3B). TRZAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: TRZAX (1.42) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TRZAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TRZAX (6 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TRZAX (0.56). TRZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.50 vs. RMEBX (30.00). TRZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: TRZAX (0) vs RMEBX (250). TRZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.55 vs. RMEBX (9.98). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.93 vs. TRZAX (17.97).
| RMEBX | TRZAX | RMEBX / TRZAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.56 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.801 | 11.436 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 115B | 33.3B | 345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.42 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.98 | 16.55 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.14 | 44.47 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.93 | 17.97 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement