Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs TRZAX
RMEBX vs TRZAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs TRZAX
RMEBX vs TRZAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. TRZAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and TRZAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. TRZAX (34.2B). TRZAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: TRZAX (1.42) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than TRZAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs TRZAX (6 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than TRZAX (0.56). TRZAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.50 vs. RMEBX (30.00). TRZAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: TRZAX (0) vs RMEBX (250). TRZAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.46 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. TRZAX (23.78).
| RMEBX | TRZAX | RMEBX / TRZAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.56 | 191% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 14.363 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 34.2B | 342% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.42 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 19.46 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.37 | 46.94 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.74 | 23.78 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement