Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs USPFX
RMEBX vs USPFX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs USPFX
RMEBX vs USPFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. USPFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and USPFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. USPFX (85.7M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than USPFX: RMEBX (1.04) vs USPFX (0.85). RMEBX was incepted earlier than USPFX: RMEBX (12 years) vs USPFX (10 years). USPFX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. USPFX (12.93). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than USPFX: RMEBX (250) vs USPFX (2500). USPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.03 vs. RMEBX (9.11). USPFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.16 vs. RMEBX (34.74).
| RMEBX | USPFX | RMEBX / USPFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.15 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.52 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 3.705 | 170% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 85.7M | 136,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.85 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 16.03 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.37 | 31.23 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.74 | 45.16 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.33 | 177.24 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement