Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs VWNAX
RMEBX vs VWNAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs VWNAX
RMEBX vs VWNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. VWNAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and VWNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. VWNAX (68.6B). VWNAX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: VWNAX (1.35) vs RMEBX (0.99). RMEBX was incepted earlier than VWNAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs VWNAX (25 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than VWNAX (0.24). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. VWNAX (22.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than VWNAX: RMEBX (250) vs VWNAX (50000). VWNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. RMEBX (4.65). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. VWNAX (12.67).
| RMEBX | VWNAX | RMEBX / VWNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.24 | 446% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.24 | 446% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.448 | 11.835 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 68.6B | 171% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.35 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.65 | 6.33 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.88 | 27.05 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.68 | 12.67 | 274% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.45 | 49.66 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement