Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs WHGLX
RMEBX vs WHGLX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs WHGLX
RMEBX vs WHGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. WHGLX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and WHGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. WHGLX (73.8M). WHGLX (1.05) and RMEBX (1.04) have matching dividends . RMEBX was incepted earlier than WHGLX: RMEBX (12 years) vs WHGLX (20 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than WHGLX (0.71). WHGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGLX: RMEBX (250) vs WHGLX (100000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.16 vs. WHGLX (-8.85). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.79 vs. WHGLX (-10.42).
| RMEBX | WHGLX | RMEBX / WHGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.63 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.71 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.885 | 4.868 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 73.8M | 158,537% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.05 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.16 | -8.85 | -103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.97 | 1.65 | 2,058% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.79 | -10.42 | -324% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.81 | 28.39 | 327% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement