Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs WHGQX
RMEBX vs WHGQX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs WHGQX
RMEBX vs WHGQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. WHGQX (74.3M). WHGQX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: WHGQX (1.12) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than WHGQX: RMEBX (12 years) vs WHGQX (4 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than WHGQX (0.63). WHGQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WHGQX: RMEBX (250) vs WHGQX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.14 vs. WHGQX (-7.17).
| RMEBX | WHGQX | RMEBX / WHGQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.55 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.63 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.444 | 5.837 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 74.3M | 157,470% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.12 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.14 | -7.17 | -141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.54 | 2.65 | 1,304% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.62 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.57 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement