Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs WLCVX
RMEBX vs WLCVX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs WLCVX
RMEBX vs WLCVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. WLCVX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and WLCVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. WLCVX (178M). WLCVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: WLCVX (1.17) vs RMEBX (1.04). RMEBX was incepted earlier than WLCVX: RMEBX (12 years) vs WLCVX (30 years). RMEBX (1.07) and WLCVX (1.03) have similar cost to investors . WLCVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLCVX: RMEBX (250) vs WLCVX (250000). WLCVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. WLCVX (10.16).
| RMEBX | WLCVX | RMEBX / WLCVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.00 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.03 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.308 | 8.761 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 178M | 65,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.17 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 11.32 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.37 | 32.96 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.74 | 10.16 | 342% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.33 | 46.76 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement