Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs WWLAX
RMEBX vs WWLAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs WWLAX
RMEBX vs WWLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. WWLAX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and WWLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. WWLAX (77.3M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than WWLAX: RMEBX (0.99) vs WWLAX (0.90). RMEBX was incepted earlier than WWLAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs WWLAX (19 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than WWLAX (0.88). WWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWLAX: RMEBX (250) vs WWLAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. WWLAX (-6.92). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. WWLAX (-7.21).
| RMEBX | WWLAX | RMEBX / WWLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.80 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.88 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.367 | 10.424 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 77.3M | 152,652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.90 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.03 | -6.92 | -130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.30 | 5.66 | 677% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.75 | -7.21 | -496% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.55 | 27.38 | 331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers