Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs WWLAX
RMEBX vs WWLAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs WWLAX
RMEBX vs WWLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. WWLAX commentary
Jun 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Hold and WWLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. WWLAX (74.5M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than WWLAX: RMEBX (1.04) vs WWLAX (0.92). RMEBX was incepted earlier than WWLAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs WWLAX (18 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than WWLAX (0.88). WWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWLAX: RMEBX (250) vs WWLAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.14 vs. WWLAX (-7.25). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.62 vs. WWLAX (-8.87).
| RMEBX | WWLAX | RMEBX / WWLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.80 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.88 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.444 | 5.678 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 74.5M | 157,047% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.92 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.14 | -7.25 | -140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.54 | 2.47 | 1,396% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.62 | -8.87 | -402% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.57 | 29.12 | 325% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement