Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RMEBX vs WWLAX
RMEBX vs WWLAX Comparison
Open Charts RMEBX vs WWLAX
RMEBX vs WWLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RMEBX vs. WWLAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RMEBX is a Buy and WWLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. WWLAX (76.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than WWLAX: RMEBX (1.00) vs WWLAX (0.92). RMEBX was incepted earlier than WWLAX: RMEBX (12 years) vs WWLAX (19 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than WWLAX (0.88). WWLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WWLAX: RMEBX (250) vs WWLAX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. WWLAX (-7.52). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.28 vs. WWLAX (-7.80).
| RMEBX | WWLAX | RMEBX / WWLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.80 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 0.88 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.059 | 8.390 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 76.2M | 154,856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.92 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | -7.52 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.30 | 2.04 | 1,680% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.28 | -7.80 | -465% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.36 | 25.15 | 355% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers